WaPo: New Way Forward Needed on Broadband Oversight
A Washington Post editorial proposes a "fourth way" regulatory framework for broadband Internet in reaction to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski's "third way" plan.
The editorial argues that the FCC should not attempt to fit broadband into an existing, yet largely incompatible regulatory framework. Rather, the FCC should work with Congress to create clear, yet limited, new rules for broadband providers that focus on increased reporting, monitoring and transparency.
Earlier this month, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski announced his support for reclassifying the transmission component of broadband Internet access service as a Title II telecommunications service, in light of the U.S. Circuit Court's ruling in Comcast v. FCC.
The regulatory reclassification is in response to the court's ruling that allows ISPs to control traffic speeds over their own networks and block a third party from using its infrastructure to push its own content. As a result, the ruling jeopardizes the FCC's goal to bring high-speed broadband connections to rural and low-income areas.
The Washington Post points out that tailored regulatory legislation will also provide the FCC with the explicit legal authority to begin oversight and allow it to continue implementation of its national broadband plan.
Why Broadband Regulation Needs Help from Congress (Washington Post)
CWA members oppose AT&T’s attempts to stop serving rural and low-income communities in California
CWA urges FCC to deny industry attempts to loosen pole attachment standards
CWA District 6 reaches agreement with AT&T Mobility